Archive for November 2025

In re LIBOR-Based FinancialInstruments Antitrust Litigation, 11-MD-2262 (NRB) (S.D.N.Y.) Total Settlements of Approximately $800 Million. The LIBOR Antitrust Litigation on behalf of those persons or entities who purchased or otherwise acquired U.S. Dollar LIBOR-Based Instruments in the United States directly from a Defendant (or a Defendant’s subsidiary or affiliate) and owned that instrument any time…

ISDAfix Antitrust Litigation—Over $400 Million in Settlement Funds The ISDAfix Antitrust Litigation was brought on behalf of “all persons or entities who entered into, received or made payments on, settled, terminated, transacted in, or held an ISDAfix instrument during the settlement class period of January 1, 2006, to January 31, 2014.” The lawsuit alleges that…

In Re: Liquid Aluminum Sulfate Antitrust Litigation, 2:16-md-02687-JLL-JAD (D.N.J.) This is a case brought on behalf of all persons and entities in the United States who purchased liquid aluminum sulfate directly from Defendants (as listed below) from 1997 through at least February 2011 (the “Class Period”). If you purchased liquid aluminum sulfate during this time…

Kleen Products LLC et al. v. International Paper Co. et al., 10-cv-05711 (N. D. Ill.) This is a case brought on behalf of all persons and entities in the United States who purchased containerboard products directly from Defendants (as listed below) from February 15, 2004, and November 8, 2010 (the “Class Period”). Containerboard products include…

$2 Billion Plus in Settlement Funds, Soon to Be Made Available The settlements are in the case In re Foreign Exchange Benchmark Rates Antitrust Litigation, No. 1:13-CV-07789 (S.D.N.Y.). If you entered into foreign exchange (“Forex”) contracts in a U.S. market between January 1, 2003, and December 15, 2015, with one of the defendants in the…

Case Overview This consolidated antitrust class action alleges that manufacturers and distributors of PVC pipe systems engaged in a conspiracy to fix, raise, maintain, or stabilize prices for PVC pipes and fittings in violation of the Sherman Act. The allegations include coordinated pricing using market data exchanged through the Oil Price Information Service LLC (OPIS),…

Case Overview This putative antitrust class action alleges an unlawful conspiracy to fix, raise, or maintain the prices of fragrances and fragrance ingredients in violation of Sections 1 and 3 of the Sherman Act. Defendants—Symrise AG, International Flavors & Fragrances Inc., Givaudan SA, Firmenich International SA, and their related entities—collectively make up approximately 64% of…

Case Overview This antitrust class action alleges that Defendants—the major manufacturers of Cement Chemical Additives (CCAs)—entered into an unlawful agreement to fix the prices of concrete admixtures, cement additives, admixtures for mortar, and related bundled products. CCAs are added to concrete, cement, and mortar to improve performance characteristics such as water reduction, set time, shrinkage…

The lawsuit claims generic manufacturers violated federal and stateantitrust laws, consumer protection statutes, and common law, causing End-Payers –including Consumers and Third-Party Payers (“TPPs”) (e.g., entities such as insurers oremployers with self-funded prescription drug plans) to pay more than they should havefor certain generic drugs (“Named Generic Drugs”). The “Settlement Class” or “Settlement Classes” include: “All persons…

The lawsuits—CAPP, Inc. v. Discover Financial Services, Case No. 1:23-cv-04676; Lemmo’s Pizzeria, LLC v. Discover Financial Services, Case No. 1:23-cv-14250; and Support Animal Holdings, LLC v. Discover Financial Services, Case No. 1:23-cv-15297—are pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The lawsuits allege that, beginning in 2007, defendants Discover Financial Services,…